John 8

1 …but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.

2 At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. 3 The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group 4 and said to Jesus, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?" 6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her." 8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. 10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?"

11 "No one, sir, " she said.

"Then neither do I condemn you, " Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin."

This is a very moving account of legalism with no heart abusing a defenceless and isolated soul in an attempt to trap Jesus into responding with grace when the Law required death.

The religious authorities had seen many occasions of Jesus extending grace to a wide variety of people in need and anticipated that he would do so with the victim they dragged into the Temple to stand before him and many devout witnesses. The authorities had already encountered him having no respect for their Sabbath laws by commanding the invalid at the Pool of Silom to pick up his camp bed and walk. His self-defence had resulted in their decision to kill him.

For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God. (John 5:18)

They were still on the hunt for an authoritative and unquestionably legal reason to kill him that would receive the full support of religious Jews. They had caught this woman committing adultery. Who gave them the tip off? What reward did they receive from the authorities for turning her in? What about her male accomplice? Was she a victim of his rape attack or did she seduce him? Irrespective of the context of their catch, the authorities had caught her in the very act of adultery.[1] There could be no clearer breaking of the Law. The religious hunters showed their eagerness to use her as a trap to catch Jesus by interrupting his teaching session and forcibly making her stand in the centre of the Temple attendees to be interrogated and charged. The practice of the day was to make the accused stand up in the centre of the interrogators. This could be both daunting and humiliating. The actions of the accusers against the woman had the hallmarks of an eager criminal investigation. Guilty as charged! What would Jesus do?

They made her stand before the group 4 and said to Jesus, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the very act of adultery."

Now they had a clear legal case to trap him. They did not need the Guards to drag her forcibly to the Temple. They were so confident in their catch to trap Jesus that they dragged the "seducer" themselves, no doubt eagerly, into the centre of the Temple teaching.

5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?"

John adds the editorial comment,

6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

Their motivation was not lost on John. It was clearly obvious what they were attempting to do. He notes that their focus and interest was not the woman. It was Jesus, whom the attendees at the Feast of Tabernacles had been fearful to support publicly, because of the search the authorities had launched for him from Day 1 of the Festival. Nevertheless, the Temple Guards had disobeyed the authorities and backed off arresting him. The only weapon left for them at that point was instant derision and self-righteous posturing, i.e., until they caught the woman in adultery.

5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?"

But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger.

There has been much theorising about what Jesus wrote that was so pertinent to the situation. The point is, however, that Jesus responded how he always engaged in his interaction with people. He chose his terms of response and always maintained control of his interactions. He never let Satan work through a person or situation to control him no matter how dominating and persistent their behaviour. In this case,

7 When they kept on questioning him,

He remained silent…but then,

he straightened up and said to them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her."

8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

The silence of Jesus before this command and immediately after it drew maximum effect. Hovering over him with a torrent of questions seeking to trap him was not getting a response, but then he stopped writing on the ground and stood to speak. They probably thought that they had finally achieved a breakthrough and Jesus would either condemn the woman or incriminate himself extending forgiveness. No doubt everyone hung on his words. When he finally spoke, he switched the focus from his and the woman’s sin to their sin.

Each of the accusers would have been aware of their many sins hidden under their cloak of self-righteousness. The question was, as it is for all of us self-righteously engaged in judging another, whether or not we will be honest about the presence of our own sin.

9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there.

The response of the accusers now facing the search light of judgment turned on them was reflective and individualistic. Each was confronted with having to be honest about their own sin. They each arrived at a decision separately as the timing of their responses indicates,

…those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first…

Why the older ones first? Only a person in their latter years can answer that question with lived understanding. Age leaves behind it a path of relationship failures, wounds from others, wounds we have given others and self-inflicted emotional wounds. We become increasingly aware of our imperfections seen in the trail of our sins. We know by hard experience that we are not without sin. This is a broader and deeper reality than we had in younger years when pride drove our external image building and our obsession with image comparisons. Then we gave little thought to our self-justified judgements about ourselves and others. In old age, however, the awareness of a trail of sins increasingly deadens joy and becomes an unshakeable mountain. The older ones carried this engrained consciousness that required little self-reflection. They left first, one at a time.

…only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there.

All the accusers had gone. Those Jesus was teaching, when interrupted by the religious authorities in for his kill, were likely still there to witness the conclusion of this staged trial.

10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?"

He had stood to question the accusers. Now he stood again and asked two questions still focused on the behaviour of the woman’s accusers. They were simple clarification questions that reinforced the obvious to the woman and the onlookers from the class being taught by Jesus when interrupted by the religious leaders in for his kill. The answer was obvious.

11 "No one, sir," she said.

The response by Jesus to her was instant unexpected grace coupled with a command to change.

"Then neither do I condemn you, " Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin."

His response to sin is no different today. Any church or leader who teaches differently and promotes instant grace coupled with empathy for the seeker’s struggle against their sin with no urgency for repentance is a false teacher.

Dispute over Jesus’ claims of self

John now switches his focus from the woman back to the Pharisees, who were continuing to challenge the legitimacy of Jesus. John covers their continuing interaction in lengthy detail, because of its significance in Jesus bringing to a head his claim of pre-existent, eternal deity, viz.,

58 "Very truly I tell you, before Abraham was born, I am!"

This claim is simple and forceful, a clear statement from Jewish history, using the father of Judaism as a reference point, and unmistakable in its claim of personal identity. Jesus claims to be the eternal I AM, the Creator of all, which far exceeds being a miracle-worker restoring the sight of a blind man.

The religious leaders and devout Jews present had no alternative than to execute him on the spot for this greatest of blasphemies of identifying himself as the I AM of their national formation through Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses. Consequently, John took time to detail this milestone interaction, as follows:

Giver of life

12 When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."

Jesus begins this interaction chosen by him with one of his many "I am" statements, φῶς εἰμι[2] Those listening would have immediately connected this claim of identity with God’s only name "Yahweh" meaning "he who always was, is and forever will be". Jesus claims to be the light of the world (i.e., all humanity and not just a privileged few). He was not just any light increasing one’s sight in understanding a topic under consideration. His claim was to be the eternal life giver. He is the light of life.

None of the Pharisees could make such a claim. Their only option was to discredit him before those present.

13 The Pharisees challenged him, "Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid."

Authentic witness

The challenge by the Pharisees based on their law ignorantly trapped them immediately in exposing the contrast between Jesus as divine and authentic and them as religious technicians and oppressors.

14 Jesus answered, "Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going.

The test for every person claiming to be an authentic witness of God today is the same as the test Jesus applied to himself here.

…my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going.

Unless I confidently know these aspects about my eternal journey with Jesus, I will not be an authentic witness and distract from his nature. Do I know for certain where I came from and where I am going or am I still uncertain about who I am and the journey I am on?

True spiritual identity

Jesus continued…

15 You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. 16 But if I do judge, my decisions are true, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me. 17 In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two witnesses is true. 18 I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me."

Jesus now uses the Law


  1. The adjective used by the accusers is ἐπαυτοφώρῳ (epautophóró) meaning "caught in the very act". ↩︎

  2. εἰμι (eimi) is the basic Greek word for being (i.e. to be) without explicit limits. He therefore claims to be the timeless being of light, life, resurrection, way, truth, good shepherding, bread, true vine. ↩︎

John 7

The Festival of Tabernacles

The aftermath hiatus

1 After this, Jesus went around in Galilee. He did not want to go about in Judea because the Jewish leaders there were looking for a way to kill him.

Jesus was in hiatus wandering around in Galilee.[1] John does not describe this time having any purposeful activity such as teaching in the synagogues or healing the sick. Jesus had just precipitated a watershed in his relationship with a pursuing crowd and religious leaders on the hunt, just as he will in his relationship with every person attracted to him. As a result, his popularity vapourised in many, the crowd shrank and the leaders intensified their determination to kill him, which had begun with the healing of the invalid at the Pool of Siloam (John 5:18) Few remained to follow him, who he tested to assess their relationship durability. How much did these mounting rejections wound the emotions of Jesus and create a necessary hiatus for Jesus to process and refocus, or did his love for his Father, and the certainty of his Father’s enduring love, enable him to keep his heart focused on listening to what his Father wanted from him in the present as necessary preparation for the spiritual challenges he would soon face attending the Feast of Tabernacles?

Watershed

Relationships often reach a watershed in order to grow. When the watershed is avoided by one or both parties, the relationship begins to stagnate and loose its life. God is well-aware of that with us. History is full of those who started well in seeking to know God and then faded[2], even some shifting to strong opposition after hitting a watershed in their understanding of his requirements for a wholesome relationship.

In a relationship watershed, one or both parties seek to clarify with honesty the structural underpinnings of the relationship that have developed to that point, and how they will shape it in the future. For example, we seek to clarify how committed we are to our relationship partner when hearing their wants from us and the degree of their commitment. Am I in this relationship for something specific that I want and think it might deliver it to me? Will it do so in fact? What is the limit placed on my time of investment in the relationship to find out? What are the behavioural boundaries beyond which I will not go? Similarly, what about my trial partner? Honest discussion on such topics enables each party to visualise the future value, shape and sustainability of the relationship. It is particularly essential when the requirements are high, as they are with Jesus. With his mounting popularity, it was essential for him to clarify the shape of the relationship that he sought with any seeker of him, in order for both to test its likely durability.

Therefore, Jesus brought his relationship with the masses and religious leaders to a watershed. He had come to give life to each person’s spirit by union with his Spirit, and showed himself to be well aware of obstacles that block and deplete that life-giving union with him. Accordingly, he had just described the nature of the relationship he required with each person in the starkest terms of eating his flesh and drinking his blood (John 6:53). The majority of hopeful followers failed to grasp the critical spiritual truth expressed in this physical metaphor. They found the stark terms of eating his flesh and drinking his blood confusing yet knew this imagery showed that his expectation of the level of intimacy he wanted was too high and difficult, even to gain eternal life. It was too costly to most in the crowd. They had reached their watershed and left. The religious authorities saw the exodus and became even more embolden to kill him.

With minimal reflection, we can easily detect if our relationship with God as revealed in Jesus has reached a watershed. We join the crowd having reached our watershed or remain committed to continuing the work of God as defined by Jesus – continuously trusting him in every circumstance and relationship that we encounter[3].

Well-meaning advice

2 But when the Jewish Festival of Tabernacles[4] was near, 3 Jesus’ brothers said to him, "Leave Galilee and go to Judea, so that your disciples there may see the works you do. 4 No one who wants to become a public figure acts in secret. Since you are doing these things, show yourself to the world."

Families often have ready advice for a family member in relationship problems. Their love is genuine. Their natural desire is to protect, but often their advice is tainted by their own values or unresolved issues being projected onto the family member. The younger brothers of Jesus exposed their wants and personal investment in the popularity of their older brother increasing to the point of dismissing his safety reasons for staying in Galilee. Their wants came first. Go to Jerusalem to be seen.

"Show yourself to the world" drives the money-making efforts of many.

Was this the hidden motive driving the advice now given by the brothers of Jesus? Were they oblivious of the threats on his life by the religious authorities and prepared to surrender their brother to satisfy their physical wants?

Physical currency and physical image dominate the thoughts of most people. We see it to the extreme in modern media. The more extensive the image-visibility of an organisation, group or individual becomes, the greater the potential of idolisation and wealth generation. Money is the world’s currency used by Satan to control, damage and enslave a person to their projected image, pride and habits.

Jesus lived by a different currency. His life was spiritually driven and focused. He aimed to act in unity with his Father’s will at every moment. His Father was building a spiritual kingdom using spiritual means. The voice of his Son did not need to be heard in the streets. (Isaiah 42:2). Jesus carried the commission of his Father to win the spiritual warfare against Satan, who held each dead spirit captive to his wishes. Were his brothers still oblivious to this mission of Jesus and the spiritual warfare mounting against him by the religious power structure in Jerusalem? John notes,

5 For even his own brothers did not believe in him.

This is amazing given all the exposure to his mission that had been relayed to them by their parents, Mary and Joseph, and by senior members of the Jewish community such as Simeon and Ann the prophetess, who they met at the Temple (Luke 2:25-38). Nevertheless, John’s assessment is that the younger brothers of Jesus had not yet come to trust his claims of deity, even in the face of the multiple miraculous acts they saw him doing continuously. They remained focused on his physical, image-building actions as a miracle worker and failed to embrace his teaching on the spiritual reason behind them. They saw the joyous tone of the Feast of Tabernacles as an ideal opportunity to popularise his image and fame as a miracle-worker. There could not be a more conducive gathering to do that. Their focus on fame, however, ignored the spiritual purpose of his miracles, that he had previously stated clearly,

"For the works that the Father has given me to finish—the very works that I am doing—testify that the Father has sent me… For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day." (5:36, 7:40)

The spiritual purpose driving the miracles of Jesus was to buildthe belief in him (trust) that is essential for our salvation. That is why his Father sent him. The joyous atmosphere of the Feast would have been a distraction and dismissed the quiet self-reflection needed to consider the spiritual identity of Jesus as the Son of God and his claims to give eternal life. His brothers had missed that point. So too can we. Light-hearted celebrations do not foster the sober, balanced and honest self-examination needed to see spiritual reality. The chances of focusing on spiritual reality are virtually non-existent after three glasses of beer with mates.

This raises the question for each person considering Jesus,

"Do I want to understand his claims of spiritual identity, the purpose of his life and the nature of the relationship he wants with me, or do I want to restrict my observations of him to the assessing physical matters such as the historical evidence for his life? "

Each person deserves to give themselves an honest answer to this question. His brothers had no doubt that their older brother existed physically and was a spectacular miracle-worker, but they had not allowed his relationship requirements to touch them.

Another useful question to test our intentions is: Do I consider the continual work of trusting in Jesus too demanding, which he defined as doing the work God requires? Consequently, have I chosen to divert my efforts to less confronting and more appealing works of recognition to enhance my image in society?

Divine time

Jesus operated on his Father’s timing, which was revealed to him by God’s Spirit each moment and governed by the prophecy given to Isaiah (42:1-4)[5].

6 Therefore Jesus told them, "My time is not yet here; for you any time will do. 7 The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify that its works are evil".

God’s timing was not determined by popularity but by the spiritual readiness of the individuals he wanted to bring to faith in Jesus and become temples of his living Spirit. Consequently, Jesus often instructed some, who were miraculously healed by him, not to broadcast what he had done, e.g., the healed leper (Matthew 8:4), the healed two blind men (9:30), the healings of a large crowd (12:16), his transfiguration before Peter, James and John (17:9) etc. The recipients of these targeted miracles were ready to entrust their lives to him. The social grapevine was not. It was driven by prejudice, judgement and self-interest, as it still is. In Jerusalem, the ever-present, visible religious power structure would use the social grapevine to turn these targeted miracles of Jesus into weapons of attack on the integrity of the healed recipients and intensify their relentless attack on Jesus.

In this case, Jesus was clear.

8  You go to the festival. I am not going up to this festival, because my time has not yet fully come.

In other words, "My time has not yet reached its full capacity[6]. It has not yet reached the point of completion to usher in God’s next act of revealing my purpose to the world." Jesus only did what the Spirit of his Father was directing him to do at each moment. In this case, it was to stay put for the moment. He did not need to know why.

The same principle applies to anyone wanting a spiritually productive relationship with God. Timing governs spiritual usefulness – a time to weep, a time to mourn, a time to laugh, a time to instruct, a time to remain silent. I have often been insensitive to timing by not listening to the Spirit on how to engage in conversation in the moment. God’s spiritual work cannot be forced onto a heart of stone.

9 After he had said this, he stayed in Galilee. 10 However, after his brothers had gone up[7] to the festival, he went up also, not publicly, but in secret.

Had Jesus deliberately tricked his brothers about his intention not to go up to the Feast? If Jesus did only what his Father instructed at any moment, then what he told his brothers was the information he had at that moment. Shortly after, he was told to go up, and it was not for him to question why. His Father knew what he wanted to achieve. He knew the crowd readiness for him to act. What did Jesus find on arrival?

Crowd readiness

Temperature

11 Now at the festival the Jewish leaders were watching for Jesus and asking, "Where is he?"

The leaders

From the outset, John highlights the fear-saturated environment Jesus found in Jerusalem, as anticipated, that was fuelled by the intent of the religious power structure to kill him. The word John uses to describe their current state indicates that the authorities were actively searching for Jesus among the crowds[8].

The crowd

13 But no one would say anything publicly about him for fear of the leaders.12Among the crowds there was widespread whispering[9] about him.

The response of the crowd was to go underground. John describes their temperature as widespread secretive and subdued discontent against the threats hanging over them from the leaders. Nevertheless, it was a crowd divided in opinion about Jesus, as any crowd would be today.

Some said, "He is a good man." Others replied, "No, he deceives the people."

Some credited Jesus with intrinsic goodness, just as we use the word today to describe a good man i.e., someone we would like to have by our side bringing balance and protection when under the microscope of our social setting.

The negative critics considered Jesus was leading people astray. In the Greco-Roman world of the time, the concept of being led astray was often associated with false philosophies and teachings that deviate from accepted truth. We have examples today of popularised philosophies or teachings seeking to bend the cultural opinion to endorse individual or group behaviour that has been seen as unacceptable in the past, such as sexual roles, educational practices etc.

Timing

14 Not until halfway through the festival did Jesus go up to the temple courts and begin to teach.

Initial frivolities and scattered attention spans would have toned down by mid-week. It was time for Jesus to begin to teach. By now, those of the Jews who had gone to the Temple could recognise significant, scholarly wisdom. Their response to the teaching of Jesus shows this to be the case.

15 The Jews there were amazed and asked, "How did this man get such learning without having been taught?"

In other words, "Who is this man? What is the source of his learning?" These religious Jews were beginning to grapple with his identity. Jesus stepped into their question given that these worshippers had begun to ask the right questions. The timing to answer their questions and confront them with his identity was now!

16 Jesus answered, "My teaching is not my own. It comes from the one who sent me.

This begs the question, "Well then, who sent you?"

This question remains today. Some investigate it seriously. Others do so flippantly with no interest in the answer. Jesus immediately makes it clear that,

17 Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own.

Even though some seemed ready to consider the identity and authority of Jesus, he made it clear from the outset that gaining an understanding of the source of his advanced learning will not result from any kind of intellectual assessment and debate, but only by the moral choice to submit one’s will to the will of God. Jesus promises that as soon as that choice is made, revelation of the source of his wisdom will happen.

This spiritual reality remains true today. We will never understand the divine identity of Jesus and his mission on earth without first submitting our will to the will of God, whatever that may be at any particular time in our life. This statement of Jesus is simply another way of saying that the work of God, if we want to do it, is to trust him continually, which we will only do when our will is surrendered to him. Submission of our will and trust work together. Remove one, then the other disappears. Our personal question therefore becomes, "Have I settled the matter that I will surrender my will to God to the extent that I will trust him in all aspects of my life?" This is doing the work of God. It manifests in the trust of my life to Jesus[10]. All other efforts to arrive at a conclusion about the identity and purpose of Jesus will be wasted time and energy until that matter is resolved.

Jesus himself had resolved the matter of surrendering his will totally to the Father by choosing to come to earth, take on a limited human body, come under the authority of imperfect parents, and accept their tutelage and daily plans until the time had come for him to begin the public ministry of salvation designed by his Father.

Glory and truth

18 Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth; there is nothing false about him.

Jesus now claims to have resisted any glory he might have gained for himself through his amazing miracles and enlightening teaching, but instead he directed all glory to his Father, His speech was governed by that singular objective. As a consequence, it contained no exaggerations or lies to detract from demonstrating the glory of his Father as his mission. No personal self-seeking pride could be promoted in his speech thereby embellishing it in any way. His claims could therefore be trusted to be truth.

Nothing false! This means that I do not have the option to fault Jesus as a proven man of truth in any attempt to protect my chosen life-style and entrench my self-glorifying pride worshiping the gods it has established. Many senselessly attempt to do so, subtly or blatantly[11].

Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth

Note the definitive nature of this claim. This spiritual process applies to anyone who wants to become a person seeing and speaking truth clearly. In every situation, I must commit to foster the glory of the authority I represent, in order to prevent my subtle pride distorting the truth to enhance my own glory. Every person continually faces this challenge in their personal development. It is easy to spot distorted boasting in others while missing our own delusions about self. It is easy for my pride to project unknowingly my own distortions of truth onto others. A commitment to seek the glory of God as my life goal exposes the deceitfulness of any delay tactics, diversions and excuses I might use to avoid submitting my will to Him in full trust in each situation.

Hypocrisy and Law

It was time for Jesus to turn the focus of this public interaction upon the motives of his listeners. Was there anything false in them? Yes there was.

19 Has not Moses given you the law? Yet not one of you keeps the law. Why are you trying to kill me?"

The crowd could give only one response to being accused by Jesus of breaking the law: 1) Ignore the accusation. 2) Immediately deflect the searchlight back onto Jesus to dodge the light being shone on their motives. 3) Give him the worst label possible to dismiss any authenticity. 4) Act innocent and request specific evidence for the charge.

20 "You are demon-possessed," the crowd answered. "Who is trying to kill you?"

Jesus did not let the crowd control the interaction with him. He ignored their accusation and their open question as a technique to dodge his questioning of their motive to kill him. He avoided their attempted deflection and persisted in questioning their motives.

21 Jesus said to them, "I did one miracle, and you are all amazed. 22 Yet, because Moses gave you circumcision (though actually it did not come from Moses, but from the patriarchs), you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath. 23 Now if a boy can be circumcised on the Sabbath so that the law of Moses may not be broken, why are you angry with me for healing a man’s whole body on the Sabbath?

Jesus had already confronted the hypocrisy of the religious leaders about their use of the Law in their attempt to control an invalid of 38 years at the pool of Siloam, who Jesus had healed on the Sabbath and commanded to pick up his camp bed and walk. Their definition of work on the Sabbath forbade it. On another occasion, Jesus had gone into a synagogue on the Sabbath, where control by the religious class was the greatest, and healed a man’s shrivelled hand, in order to confront their hypocrisy using of the Law as a weapon of authority rather than a framework of mercy. (Matthew 12:9-13) Now he tackles their hypocrisy again in their inconsistent use of the Law. He questions motives to expose their religious hypocrisy.

23 Now if a boy can be circumcised on the Sabbath so that the law of Moses may not be broken, why are you angry with me for healing a man’s whole body on the Sabbath?

Why? Such inconsistency exists with every person who wishes to apply a rule book, developed by themselves, or borrowed from a religion, to govern their social interactions. We all have a rule book front of mind, or submerged in the subconscious. No person is capable of applying their rule book consistently from their bent, flawed soul, even the Rulebook given by God to Moses to govern the behaviours of a new nation. That is why love must guide law and override it where necessary. To act in love, however, requires dispensing with religious posturing and control.

24 Stop judging by mere appearances, but instead judge correctly."

Correct judgement goes beyond physical observations to spiritual sight. The majority of our instant judgements in our physical world through our five physical senses, reinforced by pride, are based on "mere appearances". Jesus commanded the crowd to stop physical judgements that result in error. God’s instruction to Samuel, when sent to choose and anoint the first king of Israel from among Jesse’s sons, explained how he focuses his assessment of a person:

The LORD does not look at the things people look at. People look at the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart. (Samuel 16:7)

Therefore, in essence Jesus is commanding, "Stop instant assessments of people through your five senses based solely on physical impressions. Catch yourself in the act of swelling your pride and switch your focus to listen to the Spirit’s assessment of their spirit. Then your assessment will be upright and not unjust. Then spiritual sight and love will govern your observations and understanding".

Identity confusion

People of Jerusalem

25 At that point some of the people of Jerusalem began to ask, "Isn’t this the man they are trying to kill? 26 Here he is, speaking publicly, and they are not saying a word to him. Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Messiah? 27 But we know where this man is from; when the Messiah comes, no one will know where he is from."

Isn’t this the man they are trying to kill? Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Messiah? When the Messiah comes will he perform more signs than this man? Confusion!

The word certainly had spread through the attendees to the Festival that the Jewish leaders were hunting for a man claiming to be the Messiah. Here he was, however, teaching in the Temple and without restraint. Jesus could not have been in a more confronting location to teach the religious adherents. He was teaching in the Pharisees’ domain of authority without a single word coming from them to silence or remove him. Why?

Chief priests and Pharisees

32 The Pharisees heard the crowd whispering[12] such things about him. Then the chief priests and the Pharisees sent temple guards to arrest him.

As soon as the Pharisees heard the smouldering, subdued, discontent of the Festival crowd questioning their authority and intentions, they acted swiftly to remove Jesus from the scene. They wanted him out of the Temple and silenced as a teacher and were prepared to use force to do so. They commissioned his forceful arrest using the temple guards, who stood a while among the Temple attendees listening to the interaction of Jesus with them.

People of Jerusalem (cont’d)

As Jesus continued teaching the Temple attendees, he revealed that his time with them would be brief and come to an end, even though they would try to extend it.

33 Jesus said, "I am with you for only a short time, and then I am going to the one who sent me. 34 You will look for me, but you will not find me; and where I am, you cannot come."

His descriptions of future location raised more questions. They focused on the ‘where?’ and ‘what?’ and missed the primary purpose of their time with Jesus coming to an end, viz., "I am going to the one who sent me".

35 The Jews said to one another, "Where does this man intend to go that we cannot find him? Will he go where our people live scattered among the Greeks, and teach the Greeks?

36 What did he mean when he said, ‘You will look for me, but you will not find me, ‘ and ‘Where I am, you cannot come’?"

Jesus from the outset of his ministry had identified himself as sent by the Father (e.g., John 5:18, 5:23-24, 5:30, 5:37, 6:39, 7:16)[13]. Now the reason for his sending by his Father was coming to an end. If the worshippers in the Temple had grasped this fact, their questions of his future location would not have arisen. He was soon to return to the Father in heaven who had sent him. The temple guards listening to these responses of the people were no doubt identifying with the questioning and wondering what he was claiming. He was going home.

Later, Jesus ascended in full view of the apostles to the Father, who had sent him. That is where he remains with his Father today and one day will return again as the global King and not as the suffering servant. This eternal, heavenly identity of Jesus continues to be missed by many who limit his identity to being a teacher restricted to a short period of history, who started a new Jewish religion through his teachings and time-restricted life example. Because they ignore, or dismiss, his eternal divine identity and purpose for being sent to earth, they place him in the same mythical basket as all other would-be religious leaders, from which to select a teaching to answer a current need.

In our day, we need to remember that upon his departure from the Mount of Olives, the attending angels made clear to his apostles that Jesus would return in the same manner as they had just witnessed him leave.

10 They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. 11 "Men of Galilee," they said, "why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen him go into heaven." (Acts 1:10)

The signs given for his return suggest that the desire of the crowd at the Feast of Tabernacles to hold onto Jesus will one day be fulfilled in us.

2 But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is. 3 All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Considered acceptance

45 Finally the temple guards went back to the chief priests and the Pharisees, who asked them, "Why didn’t you bring him in?"

Clearly, the time taken by the temple guards to listen to Jesus before forcibly arresting him had a profound effect on them, to the extent that they were prepared to disobey the command of their authorities and leave Jesus free to keep on teaching in the Temple.

46 "No one ever spoke the way this man does, " the guards replied.

They were emphatic in their description of Jesus to the Pharisees. John highlights this by using the word οὐδέποτε (oudepote), which was a composite adverb formed by joining oude (meaning "not even") together with pote (meaning "at any time" or "ever"). It was used in the New Testament to emphasize the impossibility of a situation or action ever occurring. In other words, the effect of the teaching of Jesus on the guards was to be struck by his outstanding uniqueness that stood above any other teacher they had heard, including the Pharisees wanting to silence him.

Arrogant rejection

The response of the Pharisees showed their true colours. They derided the guards, presented themselves as the arbiters of truth and mocked the Temple attendees as being ignorant and under a curse.

47 "You mean he has deceived you also?" the Pharisees retorted.

48 "Have any of the rulers or of the Pharisees believed in him?

49 No! But this mob that knows nothing of the law—there is a curse on them."

Such reaction showed how elitist and arrogant these city Pharisees were. They looked down on country dwellers visiting Jerusalem for the Feast of Tabernacles and considered them ignorant, even including Pharisees from the country, such as Nicodemus from Galilee. The equivalent today would be a city-based lawyer in a multi-national law firm deriding a lawyer in a country town servicing sheep farmers.

50 Nicodemus, who had gone to Jesus earlier and who was one of their own number, asked, 51 "Does our law condemn a man without first hearing him to find out what he has been doing?"

Nicodemus challenged his colleagues actions based on the Law itself. The only response they could give to such a challenge was to challenge his knowledge of the Scriptures.

52 They replied, "Are you from Galilee, too? Look into it, and you will find that a prophet does not come out of Galilee."

The irony was that it was their own knowledge that was flawed, and they didn’t seem to know it. Arrogance is blind to truth and distorts history. The prophet Jonah came from Galilee.[14] 53 Then they all went home…but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.


  1. John uses the Greek imperfect indicative tense of peri-pateó (περιπατέω) from the Greek words "peri" (around) and "pateó" (to walk). This tense was used for actions that are in progress or incomplete. It conveys that Jesus was spending undefined time walking around in the region of Galilee. ↩︎

  2. Moses was well-aware of the danger of the memory of a vivid, life- changing reality fading, or being distorted into corrupt worship. (Deuteronomy 4:7-20)…"Only be careful, and watch yourselves closely so that you do not forget the things your eyes have seen or let them fade from your heart as long as you live. Teach them to your children and to their children after them." ↩︎

  3. John 6:29 ↩︎

  4. The Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkot in Hebrew) lasted for 7 days. It was one of the three major pilgrimage festivals at the time of Jesus alongside Passover and the Feast of Weeks (Shavuot). It began on the 15th day of the Hebrew month of Tishrei, which usually occurs in late September to late October. It was a feast of joy that began and ended with Sabbath rest. Over 8 days, people would live in temporary shelters (tabernacles) to commemorate the Israelites’ journey in the wilderness after leaving Egypt. It was a time for giving thanks and remembering God’s provision and protection. (Leviticus 23:33-44) ↩︎

  5. "Here is my servant whom I have chosen,
    the one I love, in whom I delight;
    I will put my Spirit on him,
    and he will proclaim justice to the nations.
    He will not quarrel or cry out;
    no one will hear his voice in the streets.
    A bruised reed he will not break,
    and a smouldering wick he will not snuff out,
    till he has brought justice through to victory. In his name the nations will put their hope." ↩︎

  6. Jesus uses πληρόω (play-ro’-o) meaning "To fill, to make full, to complete" to describe the timings in his life. ↩︎

  7. John uses ἀναβαίνω (anabainó) meaning "to go up, ascend, mount" most likely because it was an uphill treck from Galilee to Jerusalem. ↩︎

  8. John uses zητέω (dzay-teh’-o) meaning "to search for, strive after, seek". It is often used in the New Testament for seeking God and His kingdom as a priority over worldly pursuits. It implies effort and focus. In this case, it is used in the pursuit of evil and opposition to God’s Messiah, who was a threat to the leaders’ control. The leaders were on the hunt, not simply casually surveying the crowd from a distance. ↩︎

  9. Γογγυσμός (phonetically gong-goos-MOS) is used for more private and often subversive forms of dissent, e.g., the Israelites complaints wandering in the desert. The leaders in this case had created such fear among the devout attendees at the Feast about any association with Jesus, discussion about him was carefully hidden. ↩︎

  10. Jesus: "The work of God is this: to believe continuously in the one he has sent." (John 6:28-29) ↩︎

  11. e.g., Mohammed’s denials of the claims of Jesus about himself: "Allah is only One God. Glory be to Him! He is far above having a son! " (Quran, Sura An-Nisa 4:171) And by this distortion, millions today are diverted from salvation in Jesus. ↩︎

  12. Γογγύζω, Phonetic Spelling:(gong-good’-zo), an onomatopoetic term imitating the sound of cooing doves; to murmur or mutter (grumble) about leadership with muffled undertones, e.g., the frequent grumbling of the Israelites against Moses and Aaron during 40 years spent in the wilderness. ↩︎

  13. John 5:18 For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God…, the very works that I am doing—testify that the Father has sent me. 37 And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me.

    John 6:38 I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. ↩︎

  14. The prophet Jonah, son of Amittai, who was sent to Ninevah to prophesy its destruction, came from Gath-hepher, a town in northern Galilee. (Joshua 19:13; 2 Kings 14:25) ↩︎

John 6

Jesus feeds 5,000+

Escalating widespread popularity

Sometime after this, Jesus crossed to the far shore of the Sea of Galilee (that is, the Sea of Tiberias),[1] and a great crowd of people followed him because they saw the signs he had performed by healing the sick.

(vv.1-2)

John now introduces another cameo of the interaction of Jesus with people. In this cameo, John covers his interaction with a crowd compared to his previous cameos featuring the interaction of Jesus with individuals.

By now, large crowds were looking for him. John cites the primary reason for these crowds was Jesus performing multiple healing miracles. John would have observed a good spread so far on his journey with Jesus. That is not an everyday occurrence in any one’s life. It would be a spectacle to go and see. Jesus had only recently chosen his first small group of six disciples including two sets of brothers working as young fishermen on the shores of the Sea of Galilee. So far they had only begun to see examples of what he meant by becoming fishers of men, if his aim was for them to do what he was doing. What they were witnessing following him was out of the ordinary. It was supernatural. Did Jesus actually intend that one day they would do supernatural healings in their task of fishing for men?

Matthew provides more insight into the rapid growth of large crowds from a sizeable geographic region following Jesus so early in his public ministry.

23 Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, proclaiming the good news of the kingdom, and healing every disease and sickness among the people. 24 News about him spread all over Syria, and people brought to him all who were ill with various diseases, those suffering severe pain, the demon-possessed, those having seizures, and the paralysed; and he healed them. 25 Large crowds from Galilee, the Decapolis, Jerusalem, Judea and the region across the Jordan followed him.

(Matthew 4:23-25)

The variety of healings was large. The geographical area covered by the makeup of the crowds was significant. Only one of the ten Hellenistic city-states of the Decapolis[2] lay on the West of the Jordan River in Israel. The rest were spread out east of the Jordan. Therefore, Jesus had covered a sizeable area in his early ministry demonstrating his power in effectively healing a range of medical and demonic conditions, as described by Matthew. No wonder the crowds kept growing, and with that the concerns and opposition of the religious authorities. The challenges facing disciples in journeying with Jesus were intensifying. They needed time with him alone to learn and strengthen resolve.

Withdrawal for recuperation and teaching

As often happened during the life of Jesus, he made himself scarce when people wanted to use him for their ends[3]. He needed time with his Father to regain perspective and energy. His disciples also needed time with Jesus alone to understand his ministry and their role. Consequently, Jesus now retreats to a mountain to be alone with his disciples to recuperate and refocus in preparation for the Passover.

3 Then Jesus went up on a mountainside and sat down with his disciples. 4 The Jewish Passover Festival was near.

With the coming Passover festival, this free time of rest and interaction with his disciples was essential, particularly because of the demands that would be placed on them by crowds over the Passover Festival. But their free time was short lived.

The test

5 When Jesus looked up and saw a great crowd coming toward him, he said to Philip, "Where shall we buy bread for these people to eat?" 6 He asked this only to test him, for he already had in mind what he was going to do.[4]

John gives no indication how long Jesus and his small band of disciples were able to be alone. The point is that Jesus turned what the disciples may have considered to be an interruption into another demonstration of his power over creation.

"Where shall we buy bread for these people to eat?"

Jesus turns to Philip to engage his thinking about the situation. It is easy to witness a situation and yet be left untouched by it, because we have not stopped to place ourself into the situation. We treat it as an interruption to our agenda for the day. Hence, although physically present, we remain as an untouched observer detached from what is facing us, whether it be an event, or a person trapped in a situation of desperate need. We merely observe, even though our body language may fake some interest, yet we do not open our being to be touched.

The question Jesus directs to Philip is one that forces him to engage with the physical needs of the crowd, i.e., their empty stomachs. This would particularly have concerned the mothers with infants in the crowd. The stomachs of children cry out before adults.

"Where shall we buy (ἀγοράσωμεν, agora-somen) bread for these people to eat?"

In posing this question to Phillip, Jesus uses a form of the Greek word agorazo, which meant to "buy in the agora, i.e., in the marketplace". In each Greek township, the "agora" was the marketplace/town-centre. Clearly, on the mountainside they were far from any town centre with its agora. They could not buy (ἀγοράζω, agora-zó) anything[5]. Phillip had no solution he could offer. John saw more in the question unexpectedly directed at Phillip and adds his editorial comment to the situation,

6 He asked this only to test him, for he already had in mind what he was going to do.

Did Jesus at some time later give this insight to John, or is John taking some editorial license here? Either way, this crowd of 5,000 men, plus women and children, needed feeding. Jesus placed addressing this need above the needs for healing that would be in the crowd. Phillip had no answer. His quick calculation of what it would cost to feed such a crowd put it out of the realm of immediate possibility.

7 Philip answered him, "It would take more than half a year’s wages to buy enough bread for each one to have a bite!"

Andrew, on the other hand, looks to see if any of the crowd have come prepared with a packed lunch to satisfy their hunger while following the Healer. Maybe he thought those who did could be encouraged by Jesus to share.

8 … Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, spoke up, 9 "Here is a boy with five small barley loaves and two small fish…

What Andrew finds is minimal, so he questions its practical value. "… how far will they go among so many?" I would have done the same.

Who can visualise five small barley loaves and two small fish being any other than five small barley loaves and two small fish? Even if they were broken up into small pieces they would hardly feed any more than a few. Andrew’s imagination could only go that far. He was not yet tuned in to the focus of Jesus to turn every situation into an opportunity to display his glory. Often I am not. Yet that is always God’s objective. We have lost sight of God’s glory and can’t even imagine it. Jesus came that we might see it. That is his objective for journeying anyone. He proceeded with a totally unpredictable miracle to demonstrate his glory to each of his followers and the growing crowd.

The miracle

Preparation

10 Jesus said, "Have the people sit down." There was plenty of grass in that place, and they sat down (about five thousand men were there).

The Jewish practice derived from Persia was for men to recline around a meal table as the disciples did with Jesus, while women and children sat on steps or the floor. Jesus turned to his disciples and instructed them to make the 5,000 men in the crowd recline[6] on the grass, as if about to be served a meal. The women and children present are not mentioned but would have had to sit or stand. The presence of the young boy with his lunch points to the strong likelihood that this crowd did include some children. It was most likely a crowd of men, women and children. If it had many family groupings, then we could assume that, say one half of the 5,000 men, could have been accompanied by a wife and one child. If this was the case, then the feeding miracle Jesus was about to perform would have addressed the hunger of 5,000 + 2,500 + 2,500 persons. The point is, that whatever the actual number was needing food, the miracle Jesus was about to perform was a spectacular demonstration of his control over the physical realm that could not be debated or diminished by the religious authorities wanting him silenced. They may challenge a physical healing but not such a visible and measurable miracle in the realm of nature.

Procedure

11 Jesus then took the loaves, gave thanks, and distributed to those who were seated as much as they wanted. He did the same with the fish.

Gratitude

Jesus then took the loaves, gave thanks[7]

Before Jesus performed the coming miracle he directed his heart to his Father with thankfulness. In other words, he thanked his Father for the miraculous provision of food that He intended to provide for the sustenance of the individuals in the crowd. Every miracle performed by Jesus in his lifetime was initiated by his Father as an act of good grace, with Jesus being the Father’s present touch acting in obedience to his Father. This remains true today for any miracle in our life. The Father continues to touch those of us in his family with miraculous acts of love through Jesus.

Abundance

…and distributed to those who were seated as much as they wanted.

He did the same with the fish.

John was an observer of the miracle. He helped seat the people and then helped in the distribution of the food and the later clean up. He is careful to record this interesting feature of God’s gracious provision of food to the people. They had as much as they wanted. This was not restricted by their location. They had let their passion to see more of Jesus spur them to take the risk to pursue him in an isolated place, where there was nothing to address their physical needs – fathers, mothers and children. God’s grace always supplies what is needed according to our need, whether that be physical, social or spiritual.

The grace did not run out with the bread. It also extended to the fish.

Measured result

12 When they had all had enough to eat, he said to his disciples, "Gather the pieces that are left over. Let nothing be wasted." 13 So they gathered them and filled twelve baskets with the pieces of the five barley loaves left over by those who had eaten.

Jesus did not rush the crowd in their eating. He imposed no time deadline to finish. He waited until the last had eaten to their satisfaction and then instructed the disciples to clean up the left overs.

Why do that in an open field on a mountainside? Was Jesus merely setting an example of being a good environmentalist? Hardly. Jesus gave the clean-up instruction for the disciples and the crowd to see the dimensions of the physical outcome of the feeding miracle and talk about it accurately from then on as a clear example of Jesus’ power over creation and love for each of us. We still benefit today from reading the measured result of the multiplication miracle: five small barley loaves expanded into twelve baskets full of left-overs! Incredible! John was on the spot to view the count. Each person was amply fed. God’s grace is never stingy. His abundant blessings are readily available to each person who places their confidence in his character and purposes as revealed in his promises and teachings over centuries.

Learning result

14 After the people saw the sign Jesus performed, they began to say, "Surely this is the Prophet who is to come into the world."

The response of the crowd is instant when seeing the measured result of Jesus having multiplied the five barley loaves, in order to feed everyone to their satisfaction. The stunning miracle linked immediately to their national aspiration of a day when the Prophet described by Moses would come and lead them to freedom from their Roman oppressors as he had from the Egyptians.

The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your fellow Israelites. You must listen to him. 16 For this is what you asked of the Lord your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly when you said, "Let us not hear the voice of the Lord our God nor see this great fire anymore, or we will die."

(Deuteronomy 18:15)

Was Jesus this prophet: The Prophet? Clearly they concluded that he likely was and their response was swift and determined.

15 Jesus, knowing that they intended to come and make him king by force

Withdrawal to the Father

No one was going to set the timing of Jesus becoming a king. His actions and statements during his ministry consistently demonstrated that his Father controlled the moment through the obedience of Jesus when he will rule, not just in the response of this amazed crowd, but over the entire world. Therefore, Jesus withdrew, as he had done before now to the attempt of the incensed attendees of his hometown synagogue to throw him off a cliff. It was only in the previous hour that he had begun his public ministry in that synagogue by announcing himself as the fulfilment of Isaiah’s prophecy of the Messiah, who would come to free Israel and rule the nations.[8] He warned the attendees that their familiarity with him over the years interacting with him as the growing son of Joseph the town carpenter did not give them any special privileges. He proved his point citing God’s provision for a widow in Sidon using the prophet Elijah and God healing the leprosy of the Commander of the Aramean army using the prophet Ezekiel. Yet at those times in Israel there were plenty of widows in need and people with leprosy. The synagogue congregation were furious at his claim that they would receive no favouritism from God as neighbours and forcibly dragged Jesus to the top of a hill. As they were attempting to throw him off the cliff, Jesus

walked right through the crowd and went on his way.

(Luke 4:28-30)

His time had not yet come. He was in control of that time and no one else. He had only just announced the beginning of his Messianic ministry. Somehow he miraculously freed himself from their tight grip and passed right through the pressing crowd. He immediately went down to Capernaum on the shores of Lake Galilee to continue his synagogue ministry on the Sabbath that he had just started in his home town, and cast a demon out of an attendee. His fame spread from there.

Not long before this, his mother had attempted to promote his ministry according to her timing (John 2). Jesus responded to her sense of urgency for him to solve an embarrassing planning disaster at a wedding where the wine had run out at the height of festivities. His response to her was swift,

Woman why do you involve me? My hour has not yet come.

This was not his timing. It was not his hour. It was hers. The Father had not yet told him to get involved with a miracle. Nevertheless, after questioning her motivation for seeking to involve him, he proceeded with the miraculous provision of an abundance of top quality wine. God’s glory was seen by his disciples serving the water transformed into wine, and they believed in him. Now they saw this glory again distributing the results of another feeding miracle.

Jesus maintained control of his life, and his ministry time, nature and place in obedience to his Father. He still does with each of us. At the beginning of his ministry, his hometown crowd wanted forcibly to kill him. Now, in this case, the nourished recipients of a staggering miracle wanted forcibly to crown him. Kill or crown? In both cases Jesus withdrew. He controlled the time of his execution and crowning.

15 Jesus, knowing that they intended to come and make him king by force, withdrew again to a mountain by himself.

It seems that Jesus did not inform his disciples of his intention to withdraw, or for how long, because they hung around for a day waiting for him to return. Finally their patience ran out.

16 When evening came, his disciples went down to the lake, 17 where they got into a boat and set off across the lake for Capernaum. By now it was dark, and Jesus had not yet joined them.

The priority of ministry

The disciples’ impatience must have been palpable. As fishermen, they should have known better not to venture out at night onto the Lake for an arduous row over several miles in a stiff breeze. Their impatience created a dilemma for themselves that cut short the fellowship and rest time of Jesus with his Father. He became aware of their dilemma of being caught on an agitated Lake in a mega wind and went to their rescue as a priority.

18 A strong[9] wind was blowing and the waters grew rough.[10]

19 When they had rowed about three or four miles, they saw Jesus approaching the boat, walking on the water; and they were frightened.

Who wouldn’t be frightened seeing a human figure walking across a whipped up sea towards them? Now fear had overlaid their impatience and exhaustion. They were in a state of emotional disintegration.

20 But he said to them, "It is I; don’t be afraid."

How often have people down through history needed to hear such words? (I am the Creator of all life who loves you. Do not be afraid.) There was weight and hope in these words for these early disciples, because they had experienced enough of Jesus thus far to know that he loved them and had the power to change physical situations instantly. They had already watched him perform miracles of control over nature. Walking on water was just another example. Consequently, his words of assurance to them instantly dispelled their fear, and they welcomed him into their boat.

I like this account by John, because it serves as a metaphor for any person being buffeted by a storm in their life feeling like they can no longer survive alone and wondering if God cares. He does. All we have to do is invite him into our boat. That is what the disciples did, because they had seen enough of the love and power of Jesus to trust him. Many people today don’t, because they have not sought to be informed sufficiently about Jesus in the Bible to realise that he is the only one who knows them fully, and that he consistently sets free every person entwined in a situation from which they need to be set free. Instead, he remains a ghostly image off at a distance in their storm rather than the Son of God who came to love them up close and rescue them from the consequences of their relationship storms. The disciples had seen ample demonstrations of the love-driven power of Jesus to have no hesitation taking him on board. Their boat would not sink.

21 Then they were willing to take him into the boat, and immediately the boat reached the shore where they were heading.

John records this event for us to see the love and power of Jesus in action. He does not give any details in his description of how the boat reached the shore immediately. Was this another case of Jesus miraculously controlling a physical situation as he had before passing through a hostile crowd seeking to kill him? The point is: the disciples moved from danger to safety the moment Jesus stepped into their boat, and that is the personal lesson to take from this account. When we invite Jesus to step into our tumultuous life, he calms our storm.

The pursuing crowd

22 The next day the crowd that had stayed on the opposite shore of the lake realized that only one boat had been there, and that Jesus had not entered it with his disciples, but that they had gone away alone.

The crowd woke up next morning finding that Jesus and the disciples had left in their boat during the night. Possibly, before they could process what they should do next, other boats happen to arrive from Tiberius on the western shore of the Lake.

23 Then some boats from Tiberias landed near the place where the people had eaten the bread after the Lord had given thanks.

The reason for their arrival is not clear. They would have been unaware of the feeding miracle that had just taken place. No doubt, the crowd, who had been fed miraculously by Jesus, related their incredible experience to the new comers. Clearly, this person Jesus was worth chasing down to receive more things miraculously from him. He could make existence a whole lot easier keeping families fed and free from the need to work. Consequently,

24 Once the crowd realized that neither Jesus nor his disciples were there, they got into the boats and went to Capernaum[11] in search of Jesus.

The pursuit was on. Now the crowd was swollen with more boats.

25 When they found him on the other side of the lake, they asked him, "Rabbi, when did you get here?"

They were pursuing him for physical reasons and used a physically-based time and location question as their conversation starter when they caught up with him: "Rabbi, when did you get here?"

The focus of Jesus was not on the physical dimensions of events, such as time and place. He ignored their time and place question and instantly exposed their motivation disguised beneath it.

26 Jesus answered, "Very truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs I performed but because you ate the loaves and had your fill".

They were not interested in the signs Jesus was using to demonstrate his glory. Their focus was not on him. It was on them. It was on their physical needs, on nothing more and nothing less. Jesus wasted no time exposing their core motivation in chasing after him. The moment we become aware of the supernatural identity of Jesus demonstrated by hundreds of his miraculous signs, we face the focus challenge just as this crowd did. It cannot be avoided. What is causing my initial interest in Jesus? Am I curious about how I might use him to enhance my social or family status?

Will my focus in life remain on me and what I want, or am I willing to switch it to Jesus and what he wants at any moment? This is the challenge of every moment of every day after becoming aware of his divine identity. Their stomachs were their priority and the means they could use to keep themselves satisfied in life. Culinary TV shows continue to make money off that priority. Jesus challenged them to lift their focus from perishable food to food that lasts and satisfies forever. This is always the challenge Jesus places before us. What drives the focus of my life? Where is it today?

The Bread of Life

Essential and available

After challenging the crowd’s self-centred motivation for hunting him down, Jesus urges them to shift their focus.

27 "Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life…

Working for the food that spoils when food is on offer that endures to eternal life is obviously madness and meaningless. Consequently, it begs the question, "Where do I find this food that will satisfy me forever?", and "How do I work for it?" In anticipation of such questions, Jesus positioned himself in their minds as the Son of Man[12], who has been given God the Father’s seal of approval to be the provider of food that endures to eternal life.

27 "Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For on him God the Father has placed his seal of approval."

In other words, the Son of Man is God’s chosen provider of eternal life, to whom every person must go to receive eternal life.

Is Jesus the only one, however, with this God the Father stamped seal of approval, or has it been given to other religious leaders, prophets and wise men throughout history and now? No it hasn’t, because every person who seeks to promote themselves as having unique spiritual authority was born with a flawed sin nature separated from God by their sin. Buddha was. Mohammed was. Every modern day celebrity seeking their TV and internet following was, as was every militaristic leader seeking to marshal an urban army. Jesus, however, was born by God the Father’s implantation of divine sinless seed in a virgin’s womb. His identity from eternity as one with his Father was sinless. His beginning was sinless. He was always marked with his Father’s seal of approval in perfect unity with him. His obedient act to enter the human race at his Father’s request to become the sinless sacrifice for humanity’s sin did not for a moment cause the Son to cease existing at his moment of entry. He was the sinless seed implanted in the virgin’s womb. He carried the Father’s seal of approval always and carries it today to give eternal life to any person who comes to him. No one else can give eternal life. No sinner, no religious leader has ever, or can ever, carry that sinless seal of approval to give eternal life.

To sum up, do not miss the unchangeable fact that the bread that endures to eternal life is available now and it is only available through Jesus. As the conversation continued, Jesus made clear how.

Obtained through work

Jesus had urged the crowd to focus on working for the food that endures for eternal life. That naturally led to the question,

28 Then they asked him, "What must we do to do the works God requires?"

Most people would like to do good works at various times in their life, about which they feel God would take notice and put in the positive column of their balance sheet to be weighed up in their day of judgement.

What kind of work fits that criteria? How do I make sure that God will take notice of what I consider to be good deeds and balance them off with my sins and obvious failures so that I arrive at judgement with a surplus of good deeds? What kind of good deeds must I do for them to be counted? Have I done enough to outweigh my sins and avoid hell? Such concerns can lurk in most minds in quiet moments. The answer given by Jesus would have caught this crowd by surprise. It may also catch you off-guard.

The work of trust

The outspoken in the crowd asked a specific question: "What must we do". So Jesus gave a specific answer:

29 Jesus answered, "The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent."

His answer is brief and to the point. It could not be clearer or stated more simply. Jesus defines that the work the crowd must do is to believe in him continuously[13] as the one sent by their God. To believe in him is more than believing a few words he said. It is to trust in his consistent portrayal of himself in words and actions, both small and large, just as we come to believe in anyone over time. By now the people had enough evidence of this. The work Jesus requires of us today remains unchanged. The one who God sent is to be accepted and believed in for every aspect of our life every day, and not ignored or rejected. This is the work God places before every person. We have to decide if we want to take up this work of trusting in Jesus in every situation we face, or run our own race. Jesus taught that few choose to do such work.

No amount of religious, community or charitable activity can substitute for doing the work of trusting in Jesus. Such activities may be appealing work, because their visibility to others can subtly enhance our community status or religious pride. But none of it is the work of God as defined by Jesus. If I do not believe in him continuously, I have not even started to do the work of God. We can’t even fake it to make it. God sees my heart, and sees it in far more detail than I can ever remember. His sight sees every detail in my full history – the positive and negative impacts on me from others, and impacts on others by me. He sees how far I am prepared to trust him in the current moment no matter what I am seeking to project to others.

Searching for signs

The clear definition of the work of God given by Jesus was not enough for the crowd, nor was the magnitude of the recent feeding miracle on the mountainside. They still wanted more proof that he carried God’s seal of approval to be able to give them eternal life, even though they had already spontaneously attempted to make him their king, based on the magnitude of the feeding miracle.

30 So they asked him, "What sign then will you give that we may see it and believe you? What will you do?

Why the regression? What more than feeding a large crowd is needed to be seen to believe? Yet now the vocal ringleaders of the crowd wanted another sign from Jesus to believe his claims, or was this simply a delay tactic to avoid putting their trust in him? Have you noticed that our insecure pride instantly resorts to any creative resistance it can conjure up to prevent releasing its control to God’s plan for our life? We need to be honest and identify if we are in a "holding pattern" or "rejecting pattern" and giving ourselves excuses for failing to believe in Jesus.

Hence, the crowd instantly switches the focus Jesus placed on their need to believe in him, in order to do the work of God, to what more he will doto substantiate his identity for them to believe in him. They not only seek to place the onus on Jesus in this delay tactic, they also seek to justify it by sanctimoniously quoting from their scriptures.

W  will you do?** 31 Our ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written: ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’"[14]

The pointed challenge

The crowd’s treatment of this interaction with Jesus was now at the point where they needed a direct challenge of their attempt to compare him with Moses, and of their persistent unbelief.

32 Jesus said to them, "Very truly I tell you, it is not Moses who has given you the bread from heaven, but it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is the bread that comes down from heaven and gives life to the world."

Firstly, Jesus corrects the crowd’s claim that Moses had given their ancestors bread from heaven. The Source of that perishable bread was his Father and not Moses. God gives the bread from heaven. That true bread from heaven does more than feed Israelites starving in a desert at a specific time. Far greater. God is giving the true bread from heaven continually to give life to the world.[15] It is not confined to one place, one time, one limited group of people with their limited causative need. It reaches the world. It does more than satisfy an empty stomach. It gives life to the whole person. It could therefore give life to them immediately. The response of the crowd seems to indicate that this true bread had instant appeal.

34 "Sir," they said, "always give us this bread."

The true bread

Having heard the crowd’s enthusiasm to receive the bread from heaven that gives life continuously, Jesus clearly and boldly identifies himself to them as that true bread that comes down from heaven giving life to the world.

35 Then Jesus declared, "I am the bread of life.

He adds a certain promise to the person who believes in him as the bread that came down from heaven to give life to the world,

"Whoever comes to me will never[16] go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty".

Having given such a certain promise to the crowd, Jesus instantly contrasts his offer to them with their attitude to him:

Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty. 36 But as I told you, you have seen me and still you do not believe.

In other words, the problem of their disbelief did not lie with him giving insufficient miraculous signs to build their belief. The problem of unbelief was in them, Therefore, Jesus makes it clear to the crowd that the responsibility for their unbelief could not be passed off onto him. It rested squarely with them, just as it does for any person today who has ‘seen’ him and chosen not to believe.

Given by the Father & raised up by the Son

At this point in his interaction with the unbelieving crowd, Jesus introduces a greater influencer on how a person relates to him. He moves into a lengthy explanation of the causative role of his Father in the life of an individual. Does this raise the question whether or not we possess free will in how we choose to relate to Jesus, or a confined will where the Father has set its boundaries? Jesus continues,

The fact

37 All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away.

There are two certainties in this statement of fact by Jesus:

  1. All who the Father gives will come, and
  2. Jesus will never drive away anyone who does come to him.

The second certainty is for all to hear and grasp. There comes a time in life when a person begins to be aware of Jesus and develops a desire to find out more about him. Often that individual is aware they carry much sinful baggage with them – sins committed by them and sins committed against them. For that reason they avoid any activity, group or belief that causes them to feel guilty and condemned. Even though their heart is weighted down and isolated, something begins to stir over time that draws them to want to know more about Jesus. An attraction and inquisitiveness begins to shine through into their consciousness that was not there before. At this point, it is encouraging to hear that no matter how we perceive our likelihood of rejection or acceptance, Jesus commits that he will never drive us away as we approach him. He invites all who come to discover him.

Regarding the first certainty stated by Jesus, what is not clear is ‘who’ the Father gives to Jesus and what determines his choice to give. My simple view is that the Father gives to Jesus whoever he sees wanting to know him. His timeframe of seeing this is different to ours. His frame of reference is eternal and his actions are eternally initiated. God sees our heart’s response to him from his eternal timeframe before we exist in our physical timeframe. He responds immediately to the person he sees wanting a relationship of love with his pure love.

The process is central to the debate between scholars who embrace the 5 core beliefs of Calvinism and those who align more with Arminianism. Since the disobedience of Adam and Eve, mankind has been unable to initiate a saving response to God because his spirit is completely separated from the Spirit of God. It is spiritually disempowered, inert, dead. The brain of every newborn child in the fallen human race is active but their spirit is dead, no matter how cute they may look and act. Every parent enamoured with their newborn taking every opportunity to promote their cuteness, needs to keep the reality in mind that their cute child is as dead as the child next to them in the nursery. Otherwise, they will lose sight of their critical role to mentor this gift through each growth stage to become increasingly aware of the love of Jesus for them and his desire to begin a trusting relationship with them.

The Calvinist belief is that, as a consequence our dead state, God must initiate any reuniting of his Spirit of life with our disabled spirit of sin. Accordingly, God chooses individuals based on his Sovereign will for reasons within himself, which he does not have to justify to anyone. His choice of an individual is therefore an unconditional act of grace, He chose before the creation of the world those who would be saved by his grace and brought to repentance and belief in Christ.

All those the Father gives me will come to me… Jesus answered, "The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent."

The Calvinist understanding is that I believe because God chose me to do so and gives me to Jesus. His work is to choose and give, and my work is to believe in Jesus because his Father’s grace has made it possible.[17]

Those who are classified by theologians as Arminian agree with the Calvinists that God elects, but that his election of an individual is based on his foreknowledge rather than solely on his sovereign will. God elects those whom he knew beforehand would believe in him. In this case, election is based, not on the sovereign will of God, but ultimately on man’s response to the Spirit of God’s revelation about the truth of God the Father, Jesus his Son and the status of the individual’s relationship with the Father and the Son. The work of the individual is to believe in Jesus in response to God’s work of preparing their mind-set and heart-set to recognise Jesus and believe in him. This gracious work of God is called prevenient grace in Arminian belief. It is open to all.

Whether I take the Calvinist view or the Arminian view, this fact remains true:

37 All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away.

What a hopeful redeeming fact! It is based on the solid foundation of the obedience of Jesus to his Father amply demonstrated by him every day leading up to his execution on a Roman cross. He obeyed until all our sin was judged and needing no further judgement on us. That was his Father’s will. The is why he was sent. That is why he came as completely one with the Father’s will.

The basis of choice

Because of this obedience/love of Jesus, living with undivided unity to his Father’s will, and not based on our performance, the Father can give us to Jesus, free from any additional judgement. God does not judge the same sin twice.Neither do our law courts.

38 For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me.

Jesus never drives away a sinner, who approaches him and calls out to him for salvation, solely because he has committed to his Father never to do so. That is where my eternal security lies – in the unwavering commitment of Jesus to his Father’s will, and not in the consistency of my obedience to Jesus. It lies in the eternal unity of the Son with his Father that he sustains by his obedience. Therefore, I will never be driven away from God, because the strength of the commitment of Jesus to his Father holds me there, and not the strength of my commitment to him. My commitment wavers. His remains unchanged. Jesus came to earth to do the will of his Father perfectly, and so remain in perfect unity with him based on love. That was his driving motivation at all times, and when he comes again it will continue to be so.

This certainty sets my mind free to focus on, "What does the end goal of the Father’s will look like for me?" Can I imagine where am I headed in my wholistic growth and development?

The end goal

Jesus now proceeds to describe clearly the end goal of the Father for each person. It embodies three states of love, as follows,

39 And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all those he has given me, but raise them up at the last day. 40 For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day."

Hence, the three outcomes of God’s will for his creation, as expressed and fulfilled in his relationship with his Son Jesus are:

1. None are lost

The Father’s heart is that his Son should lose none of those he has been given by the Father. Jesus therefore perceived his role as the good shepherd who guides, feeds. protects and lays down his life for his sheep. (John 10) He perceived this role as a continuation of God his Father as a shepherd protecting and guiding his chosen people Israel (Ezekiel 34, Psalm 23). Yahweh continues to relate to his followers as their good shepherd through Jesus. He loses none of his sheep.

2. All are resurrected

39 And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall… raise them up at the last day.

The end goal of Jesus as the Son is to raise up at the last day those given to him by the Father. Everyone who does the continual work of believing in Jesus will be raised up at the last day. We can be confident of this certain future, because we can be confident of Jesus continually obeying the Father’s will. What will it be like to be raised up? I cannot imagine it but I can believe Jesus for it. This hope sits in the heart of every believer learning to trust Jesus for every detail of their life.

3. Eternal life is received

40 For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day."

The Last day is in the future when the believer in Jesus will be raised up, but Jesus taught the gift of eternal life is in the present for anyone who believes. Jesus had previously made this clear to his attackers,

"Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life.

(John 5:24)

According to Jesus, every person who does the work of believing in him for their full forgiveness, daily life and eternal destiny has already crossed over from death to life, Their life is now acquiring the attributes of God’s life: love, joy, peace, patience, gentleness, meekness and self-control. Therefore, they certainly will be raised up into new eternal existence on the future Last day.

Meanwhile, my security in the new heaven and earth will continue to be established upon the indivisible unity of the Son’s will with his Father, Every person’s security will. Any person who claims to provide eternal life and resurrection on the Last day on some other basis is therefore a deceiver and a liar no matter how sanctimonious and loving they may seem. They are a false god.

The crowd response

Jesus had just made astounding, mind-altering claims about spiritual life that should arrest the thinking pattern of everyone. The crowd response tragically showed that a person can reject and remain deaf to such a gift of love from their Creator. We can choose our destiny to be trapped in a physical world or set free to experience spiritual life. The crowd response showed their tragic state.

A physical focus

41 At this the Jews there began to grumble about him because he said, "I am the bread that came down from heaven." 42 They said, "Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, ‘I came down from heaven’?"

Had I lived in Nazareth seeing the son of the local carpenter often playing in the streets, I don’t think my response to his claim of being the bread of God that came down from heaven would have been much different. I may have thought he was becoming delusional with his success in repeatedly doing amazing physical miracles. But I could not deny the miracles and the intellectual dilemma they created for me.

We live in a physical world and naturally respond instantly to situations from our familiar physical framework of observation we have developed since birth. For example:

"How come this son of Joseph and Mary, who we know well, now claims to have come down from heaven? Yes, he is doing some astounding miracles. I have no explanation for them, because there are so many and so varied. There must, however, be some explanation for them, because we know where his parents say he was in a manger, which is definitely not heaven, and he definitely was never seen coming down from heaven."

We instinctively don’t consider any spiritual reality that cannot be defined by sight, sound, touch, smell and time. That is our learned habit. We stay locked in our physical framework of perception developed over our life time and miss the spiritual that is happening in front of us. We debate, grumble and don’t see. The crowd was blind. They needed a jolt. Without the jolt from Jesus, we don’t see. We need his rebuke for our dishonest delays and excuses.

Jesus’ rebuke

Jesus responded with a rebuke,

43 "Stop grumbling among yourselves," Jesus answered.

He had to grab the crowd’s attention for them to listen to the spiritual focus behind his words.

A spiritual focus

After all, he was trying to talk to them about eternal life that cannot be explained in physical terms! In trying to process what was happening with his miracles, they had not made the shift from their familiar physical world to what existed before it began, even though they religiously attended their synagogues to worship the God of eternal existence, the I AM, who was the centre piece of their recorded history and reason for their national existence. The books of Moses, the Psalms and Israel’s prophets record I AM’s many promises backed up by his miraculous actions to forge Israel into his nation specifically chosen to reveal his plan of love to the world.

They worshipped the eternal I AM each Sabbath in obedience to his commandments. They read his prophets repetitively who predicted his rule of the entire world through his promised Messiah in the last days. They also knew from their scriptures that I AM would determine their spiritual destiny when they appeared before him for judgement after their physical life ceased.

There is a more powerful reality than our current physical state that draws us to our destinies. Yet many of us, like this crowd, never shift our observations beyond our physical existence and completely miss seeing spiritual reality happening around us. The crowd was missing it.

Jesus attempts to snap the ringleaders of the crowd out of their physical world with a rebuke and an astounding claim that he, who they saw as the son of the local carpenter Joseph, was united with his eternal Father in determining their spiritual destiny.

43 "Stop grumbling among yourselves, " Jesus answered. 44 "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day.

To add weight to this claim, Jesus authenticates it with a quote from one of their major prophets.

45 It is written in the Prophets: ‘They will all be taught by God.’[18]

A spiritual climax

Riding immediately on his claim to raise up on the last day those who go to him, Jesus now pushes the spiritual understanding of the crowd further towards a spiritual climax in understanding God’s relationship with mankind,

45 Everyone who has heard the Father and learned from him comes to me. 46 No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father.

Jesus claims a unique role in the history of salvation of the Hebrew race and all mankind. No one other than Jesus could make this claim. He follows this immediately with the certain declaration,

47 Very truly I tell you, the one who believes[19] has[20] eternal life.

Jesus could not have been more forceful with the certainty of this declaration. He begins it with "Amen, Amen I tell you, " translated as "Very truly I tell you". This is like beginning a sentence with a large placard with the word TRUTH displayed on it. In other words, "Pay attention, dispel even the slightest of your doubts, what you are about to hear is absolute, provable truth". Jesus is putting the challenge unmistakeably before his listeners that if they live believing his claim to be the only human to have seen the Father, because that is from where he came, then they have eternal life now and forever. (See footnotes for the Greek tenses Jesus uses to state this continuous certainty.)

On this basis, Jesus reaffirms what he stated earlier to correct the crowd’s misuse of the feeding of the Israelites in the desert each morning with manna.

48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, yet they died.** 50 But here is the bread that comes down from heaven, which anyone may eat and not die.

The spiritual climax in the teaching of Jesus is that anyone may eat the bread of life by doing the work of continually believing that Jesus is the bread of life and live forever. The choice rests in the hands of each person to choose or reject eating the bread of life.

Only Jesus has seen God

46 No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father.

The corollary of this new claim made by Jesus is that we might be able to have times of clear spiritual insight about our spiritual identity and the nature of our journey in this life, but we never actually see God. No one has. Yahweh, the eternal I AM, is beyond our imagining as physical creatures in a physical world. Jesus, however, was not making claims to the crowd about his identity based on imagination. He claimed to be from God and to have seen the Father.

No human can make that claim. We cannot even articulate a full spiritual understanding of the oneness of God as the Father and the Son, unified by love, trust and unwavering obedience of the Son to the Father. God’s Spirit within controls how much and what we come to understand. This learning is not the result of intellectual analysis in theological institutions, but of revelation to the humble spirit of a person doing the continual spiritual work of God of believing in Jesus.

The bread of life is his flesh

Based on this claim that only he has seen the Father, Jesus climaxed his teaching about his role in our salvation. He transitions his metaphor of our relationship with him from bread to flesh. Just what kind of relationship does this indicate that he wants to establish with each person? He had already pictured his desired relationship with us as a continual work on our part of placing belief in him, "The work of God is this: to believe continuously in the one he has sent". (v.29).

48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, yet they died.** 50 But here is the bread that comes down from heaven, which anyone may eat and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever.

T  bread is my flesh**, which I will give for the life of the world."

Now he advances his imagery of our belief him from bread to flesh. The work of eating bread is a very different metaphor to eating flesh. Every person eats bread. Only depraved cannibals eat human flesh.

To those in the crowd who had not made the switch from physical to spiritual awareness, Jesus could only be considered to be promoting cannibalism. How deranged and repugnant! To the person, however, seeking spiritual awareness of the nature of a relationship with Jesus, the following words are profound.

53 Jesus said to them, "Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. 54 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. 55 For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. 56 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them. 57 Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me.** 58 This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever."

What is the closest I can come to another physical entity? It is to consume them so that their physical being is fully merged with my own at a cellular and chemical level through digestive processes. Although the visible form of a steer is no longer seen after devouring a barbeque steak, the atoms that comprised it continue to exist within me. They continue to live in me as me in some new state.

What does this image become if I seek to understand it spiritually? How would Jesus continue to live spiritually as me? Certainly the answer is far more than ticking a box after listening to a sermon that moves me. It is far more than becoming a member of a religious or social organisation. It is a description of relationship at the most intimate level of undifferentiated unity.

53 Jesus said to them, "Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.

His flesh is food and his blood is drink

Jesus has arrived at the most critical and vivid description he could give of a relationship with God that results in eternal life beginning in the present within a person. To draw the attention of his listeners to its critical nature, he begins his statement in Greek, "Amen, amen I say to you". He could not have been more emphatic in signalling the need of the crowd to give their highest regard to what he was about to tell them, "Amen, amen I say to you…" In other words, "Pay attention! I could not be more sincere and truthful in what I am about to say".

…unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.

There is no way around this statement. Jesus uses a Greek third class conditional statement with an aorist subjunctive active verb to propose our possible response to him: ἐὰν μὴ φάγητε ("if you shall have not eaten…"). The choice of this probability of not eating rests with each individual, but the conditional outcome Jesus states that follows this choice is irrevocable, "if you shall not have eaten the flesh of the Son of Man,… you have no life in you". Hear it? Jesus is declaring as emphatically as possible that we may exist physically, but the life of God that is eternal does not exist in us. Jesus then further clarifies this fact so there is no doubt,

54 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.

Then comes his explanation of why this is so. How it works. This is the impassable truth that every seeker of a relationship with God has to face.

Remaining in Jesus remaining in the Father

55 For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. 56 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them.

Remaining in Jesus

Earlier we discussed what happens when an animal is eaten and the same would happen if the animal were a human. At the atomic level, they continue to exist although no longer seen. They remain in the cannibal, and, in a real sense, he has also become part of them. This spiritual explanation by Jesus why his flesh is real food and blood is real drink is similar. "Eating his flesh" means spiritually that he remains indivisibly in us and us in him. Such a relationship cannot become any closer. It may mature but not grow any closer than him being in us, and us in him. That is the level of intimacy that God wants us to have with his Son, and therefore with his Father.

Jesus remaining in the Father

Jesus then draws upon the nature of his relationship with the Father to illustrate the relationship he wants with his followers.

57 Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me. 58 This is the bread that came down from heaven.

Jesus is stating that the essence of his relationship with his Father is what the essence of our relationship with him is to be. His was an eternal life of love maintaining unity, obedience and trust in his Father and of his Father in him. He lived with life drawn from his Father. In the same manner, Jesus states a person can live because of him. This is his desire and the will of his Father: that the one who comes to him for spiritual, everlasting life chooses to live in love focused on unity, obedience and trust in him in all situations for all things. This is eating the bread that came down from heaven!

58 This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.

59 He said this while teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum.

The challenge from Jesus to each of us, therefore, is to test the intention of our will and what we have chosen to do about the nature of the relationship that Jesus wants to have with us. To the devout attendees of their formal religion, Jesus presented a relationship far more than He becomes our life. Ours become his. Therefore, the apostle Paul who faced death for him on many occasions said,

"For me to live IS Christ"

We can take Paul’s statement and apply it to every aspect of our daily life as follows:

"For me to live IS Christ"

My body is his body to serve with today

My touch is his touch to touch with today

My ears are hisears to hear with today

My eyes are hiseyes to see with today

My voice is his voice to speak with today

My mind is his mind to think with today

My feelings are hisfeelings to embrace with today

My will is his will to surrender wholly to the Father today.

Such is the height of spiritual intimacy that the Father wants with us through his Son.

Rejecting Jesus, the Father and the Spirit

60 On hearing it, many of his disciples said, "This is a hard teaching. Who can accept it?"

There comes a time for any pupil of a teacher to decide how far they will embrace that teacher or philosopher’s teaching in their life style. What is being requested and expected by the teacher may become too difficult and acceptable. In this case, many of the people following Jesus to learn from him considered this teaching too harsh, severe or difficult.[21] Who can hear and comprehend it? They reached a watershed in the relationship.

61 Aware that his disciples were grumbling about this, Jesus said to them, "Does this offend you? 62 Then what if you see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before!

Jesus again detected the smouldering discontent that was building among the crowd at his severe teaching. He immediately challenged them using the word σκανδαλίζω (skandalizó) meaning cause to stumble, sin, shock or offend, from which English derives the word "scandal"

"Does this scandalize you?"

Jesus asked this question for each budding disciple in the crowd to assess their reaction to his teaching. It remains standing as the critical question for each person today, who has become aware of Jesus and a measure of his teaching. Does the level of commitment and love Jesus requires as the Bread of Life that came down from heaven cause you to stumble? Does it scandalize you? If so, Jesus then asks how you would handle seeing him ascend to heaven? With shock? As too hard to grasp and comprehend? Later his apostles witnessed this very event.

9 … he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their sight.

10 They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. 11 "Men of Galilee," they said, "why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen him go into heaven."

(Acts 1:9-11)

In that day, many will be caught off guard. Shock will be rampant when he comes to exert his global rule that no one will be able to avoid or dismiss.

Jesus now affirms that the words he has been using to describe the nature of his relationship to the Father, as the basis for his relationship with a disciple, are spiritual words of the highest order. They give life. His words are not intended for intellectual debate, which is merely the flesh being used leading nowhere.

63 The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you — they are full of the Spirit and life.

Jesus concludes his teaching of the crowd with the crux of every person’s existence. Their life, i.e., their spiritual life, that energizes all the wholesome development and expression of an individual’s life, can come from only one source, viz., the Spirit, Jesus was full of the Spirit and had always been from eternity past. Therefore, any word that he spoke was full of the Spirit and life from eternity. His words are eternally life-giving and spirit-energizing for those who want this quality of life and not just existence created by their own ambitions and plans.

64 Yet there are some of you who do not believe." For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and who would betray him. 65 He went on to say, "This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless the Father has enabled them."

How does the Father enable us to want to enter into a relationship with Jesus? By the Spirit who gives life through the words of Jesus that are full of the Spirit and life. Reading and listening to the words of Jesus becomes the life focus of the disciple of Jesus and not activities of the flesh driven by pride and the god it has fashioned for itself.

66 From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him.

Self-desires or his desires? Self-control or his control? Living by the flesh or empowered by his Spirit?

To whom shall we go?

As has been true with Jesus ever since, not all people seeking to understand and relate to Jesus join the majority who stop following him when the nature of the relationship he desires becomes clear. Some remain. Jesus turned to the apostles to test their hearts having heard his recent teaching,

67 "You do not want to leave too, do you?" Jesus asked the Twelve.

Do you want to leave too? Do you? Peter acted as the voice for his companions.

69 We have come to believe and to know that you are the Holy One of God."

68 Simon Peter answered him, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.

Peter and ten of his twelve companions were later executed for preaching that Jesus is the Holy One of God prophesied in their scriptures. My sacrifices are small in comparison to the Christians being executed for their faith this decade. What would cause me to stay with Jesus to the point of death for his sake? For the same reason as for the apostles: viz., to come to know Jesus, not just believe in his words and identity as recorded by those who wrote about him. Those who seek him daily, ask to be filled with his Spirit daily, obey the promptings of his Spirit throughout the day based on their trust in him, come to know him in intimate relationship, not just know about him. The apostles engaged in the work of God, eating living bread full of the Spirit and Life that continually comes from heaven. As a result, they came not only to believe in the identity of Jesus but to know that he was, who he claimed to be. Their understanding had moved beyond their mind and become clear in their spirit.

Consequently Peter answered Jesus with a rhetorical question, "Lord to whom shall we go?" and answered it himself with a clear declaration, "You have the words of eternal life". His statement echoed the claim just made by Jesus that his words were "full of the Spirit and life".

To whom can I go? To whom shall I go to receive life-giving life?

Post-script

John concludes this teaching session by Jesus with a post-script clarification about possibly the most tragic sin in human history, since Eve and Adam ate from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, and birthed the necessary coming, betrayal and execution of Jesus.

70 Then Jesus replied, "Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!" 71 (He meant Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, who, though one of the Twelve, was later to betray him.)

Flesh and blood intimacy, or flesh and blood betrayal? What will be your post-script?

"Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5 Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth.
6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be filled.
7 Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8 Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9 Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called children of God.
10 Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11 "Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12 Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.


  1. E.g., after healing the invalid by the pool (John 5:13); after claiming to be the I AM (John 8:58); after revealing himself on the road to Emmaus (Luke 24:31) ↩︎

  2. Deca meaning 10 in Greek, and polis (πόλις) meaning city-state, or a republic, comprising of a distinct urban centre with a surrounding region controlled by its governing institutions. Hence, the Decapolis was comprised of ten such republics. ↩︎

  3. 3 e.g., attendees at his home town synagogue and the Capernaum synagogue ↩︎

  4. Jesus poses the question to Phillip in the Greek aorist subjunctive tense indicating he is only proposing a probability and not certain action. ↩︎

  5. ↩︎
  6. John uses the verb ἀναπίπτω (anapiptó), which means "to fall back". This pictures the reclining posture of the attendees at the meal. Some translations simply indicate that Jesus instructed the disciples to have the men sit down on the grass. ↩︎

  7. εὐχαριστέω (eucharisteó), meaning "to be thankful" is a compound construction of ‘eu’ meaning ‘good’ and ‘xaris’ meaning ‘grace’, which, when combined, is an acknowledgement that God’s grace is good, i.e., it works well. It is an expression of God’s impeccable goodness that works well for our eternal gain and His glory.

    Some households today continue the practice of giving thanks to God for the meal about to be served for the sustenance of the participants. It recognises that God has provided the finance and the food products from nature for our sustenance and well-being. It recognises that He controls the weather and the seasons to enable farmers to supply what the population needs for good health. We eat because his grace is good and works well. ↩︎

  8. Isaiah 61:1-3 ↩︎

  9. To describe this wind John uses μέγας (meg’-as) meaning "great, large, mighty". ↩︎

  10. He describes the effect on the surface of the Lake as διεγείρω (dee-eg-i’-ro), which is a combination of the Greek preposition διά (dia, meaning "thoroughly") and ἐγείρω (egeiró, meaning "to awaken" or "to raise up"). In other words, the disciples found themselves rowing in wild weather conditions. ↩︎

  11. They had just travelled West to East across the Lake from Tiberius. Now they headed to Capernaum on the northern shore. They were keen to find the miracle-worker! ↩︎

  12. Son of Man is the primary title Jesus gave himself to focus on his humanity, while Son of God was used to focus on his deity. When God addressed Ezekiel 39 times as "son of man" he was merely calling Ezekiel a human being. Although Jesus used Son of Man more frequently than Son of God during his ministry, he nevertheless at the beginning of his ministry he clearly linked it to his heavenly identity, e.g., "Very truly I tell you, you will see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man". (John 1:50) Jesus tapped into the heightened expectation in his day of the coming Messiah prophesied by Daniel. He saw a Son of Man in heaven who was given dominion over the entire human race by the Ancient of Days. (Daniel 7:13-14) Under Roman oppression, the Jews were longing for the coming rule of this Messiah from among them. ↩︎

  13. Jesus uses the present, active, subjunctive Greek tense to indicate that this work of belief is continuous and active for the person who chooses to trust in him. ↩︎

  14. "Then the Lord said to Moses, ‘I will rain down bread from heaven for you’. (Exodus 16:4)

    "In their hunger you gave them bread from heaven and in their thirst you brought them water from the rock; (Neh. 9:15)

    "… he rained down manna for the people to eat, he gave them the grain of heaven. Human beings ate the bread of angels; he sent them all the food they could eat." (Psalm 78:24, 25) ↩︎

  15. Jesus uses the Greek present continuous tense for the Father’s giving of his true bread and for its coming down out of heaven. He is still giving. The true bread is still coming down. ↩︎

  16. John quotes Jesus coupling together two negative Greek particles in this promise to strengthen its certainty from "not"" go hungry to "never not" go hungry. His promise could not be stronger. ↩︎

  17. The Calvinist beliefs are summarised by the acronym TULIP used to represent: Total depravity (We are stained by sin in our heart, emotions, will, mind and body, and therefore cannot independently choose God.) Unconditional election (God chooses who he wants to choose independent of any pedigree or performance of the chosen), Limited atonement (Jesus died only for the sins of his chosen), Irresistible grace (God brings his elect to salvation by an irresistible internal call and grace supplied by the Holy Spirit to respond.) Perseverance of the saints (God perseveres in keeping his Elect safe from falling back under Satan’s control.) ↩︎

  18. Isaiah 54:13, 17 "All your children will be taught by the Lord, and great will be their peace. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord, and this is their vindication from me, " declares the Lord. ↩︎

  19. Greek tense used is a present active participle to emphasize continuous believing in Jesus. ↩︎

  20. Greek tense used is present indicative active signifying continuous possession in the present. ↩︎

  21. These disciples described this teaching as σκληρός (skleros) meaning, hard, harsh, severe or difficult. ↩︎